Misuse of Section 498A -a new legal terrorism is unleashed : Calcutta High Court
Case Details: Case No: CRR No.: 2864 of 2018 Bench:
Punjab and Haryana High Court imposes 10K fine on wife living in live-in relationship and tries to implicate husband and relatives in false case
Case Details: Case No: CRWP-7222-2023 Bench: Hon’ble Alok Jain, J.
Certain false FIR under POCSO as well as SC/ST Act is lodged against innocent persons – in maximum cases women using it as a weapon just to grab money, which should be stopped – Allahabad High Court
Case Details: Case Name: Ajay Yadav v State of UP
Allahabad High Court was of the view that a married woman having experience is sex does not offer resistance, it cannot be said that her physical relation with a man was against her will
Case Details: Case No.: Application under Section 482 No. 26182
Allahabad High Court fined wife for filing false rape case against husband says ‘Such a practice has to be dealt with a heavy hand’
Case Details: Case No.: Criminal Writ Petition No. 11560 of
The trial court while issuing summons, shall record detailed reasons, which should apparently show the application of mind and this duty of Magistrate cannot be marginalized – Allahabad High Court
Case Details: Case Name: Dr. Shail Kumar Jain v State
Genuine cases of such sexual offences are now exception. The general rule is of false implication in cases of sexual offences- Allahabad High Court
Case Details: Case No.: Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 23551
The Court would direct all the Courts ceased of proceedings to strictly follow the law laid down in Arnesh Kumar case – Supreme Court
Case Details: Case Name: Md. Asfak Alam v The State
Allahabad High Court denies protection to a married woman residing with live-in partner seeking protection without dissolving first marriage
Case details- Case No.- Writ C No. 5589 of 2023
Bail cannot be denied on the ground that accused has not filed an application for quashing of the FIR or charge-sheet- Supreme Court
Case title: Teesta Atul Setalvad v State of Gujarat Case