The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. SC imposes Rs 1 lakh costs on lawyer for filing PIL against Lakshadweep MP Faizal’s membership restoration
 SC imposes Rs 1 lakh costs on lawyer for filing PIL against Lakshadweep MP Faizal’s membership restoration
CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100
From Courts Trending

SC imposes Rs 1 lakh costs on lawyer for filing PIL against Lakshadweep MP Faizal’s membership restoration

by Newsdesk October 20, 2023

AA

New Delhi, Oct 20 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Friday imposed costs of Rs 1 lakh on a Lucknow-based lawyer for filing a frivolous PIL challenging restoration of Lok Sabha membership of Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal.

A bench of Justices B.R. Gavai, Aravind Kumar, and Prashant Kumar Mishra dismissed the plea with exemplary costs saying that none of the fundamental rights of the petitioner has been violated.

“You are an advocate and filing such frivolous petitions. You should think ten times before filing such petitions,” the bench remarked, ordering that half of the cost will be deposited in the accounts of the Supreme Court Bar Association and the remaining half will be deposited with the Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Bar Association.

The apex court did not allow withdrawal of the petition and said that if the petitioner fails to deposit the costs, the same shall be recovered by the concerned District Collector as an arrear of land revenue.

The same advocate was recently reprimanded by a bench headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud with a cost of Rs 5 lakh for filing a petition against the Chief Justice of Bombay High Court for allegedly not using ā€˜I’ while being administered oath.

On October 9, the Supreme Court allowed NCP leader Faizal to continue as Lakshadweep MP after Kerala High Court had refused to suspend his conviction in an attempt to murder case.

The petitioner-in-person, Ashok Pandey, contended that once a member of Parliament or a state legislature loses his office by operation of law, he will continue to be disqualified till he is acquitted from the charges levelled against him. He has also filed a similar plea against restoration of membership of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, which is likely to be taken by the Supreme Court on October 30.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version