The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Move NGT first, SC on plea challenging nod to Delhi-Dehradun e-way section
 Move NGT first, SC on plea challenging nod to Delhi-Dehradun e-way section
CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100
From Courts Legal

Move NGT first, SC on plea challenging nod to Delhi-Dehradun e-way section

by Newsdesk September 8, 2021

AA

New Delhi, Sep 8 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a plea against the forest and wildlife clearances given to the Ganeshpur-Dehradun Road (NH-72A), a part of the Delhi-Dehradun expressway.

A bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Hima Kohli noted the stage one forest clearance was given by the Environment, Forests, and Climate Change Ministry, therefore the petitioner, NGO Citizens for Green Doon, should move the National Green Tribunal first.

Advocate Ritwik Dutta, representing the NGO, contended that stretch will pass through eco-sensitive zones of the Rajaji Tiger Reserve and the Shivalik Tiger Reserve, where leopards and over 1,500 different kinds of animals were spotted.

In September last year, the stage one forest clearance for the stretch of the road was given, and in January this year, the wildlife clearance was also given. Dutta submitted his main challenge was against the wildlife clearance by the National Board for Wildlife to the project.

Pointing out that the petition’s primary prayer was against the forest clearance and the secondary prayer was connected with the wildlife clearance, the bench told counsel that if he were to succeed on forest clearance before the NGT, then secondary prayer will be inconsequential.

It emphasized that the NGT is a statutory body, and the petitioner should move it, instead of filing a plea in the top court.

Dutta contended the petitioner cannot challenge the wildlife clearance before the NGT and it can be challenged only before the apex court and urged the bench to grant stay on tree felling till the proceedings in the matter are not completed.

The bench replied that the NHAI hasn’t started construction of the road, even after the two clearances and reiterated that Dutta should move the NGT first. “You can also come here against the interim order of the tribunal,” it told him.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version