The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Married couple deprived of each other’s company, conjugal relationship ‘extreme cruelty’: Delhi HC
 Married couple deprived of each other’s company, conjugal relationship ‘extreme cruelty’: Delhi HC
Delhi High Court
From Courts Trending

Married couple deprived of each other’s company, conjugal relationship ‘extreme cruelty’: Delhi HC

by Newsdesk October 7, 2023

AA

New Delhi, Oct 7 (IANS) Upholding a family court’s order granting divorce to aman, the Delhi High Court has observed that for a married couple to be deprived of each other’s company and conjugal relationship is an act of extreme cruelty.

The family court had granted divorce to a husband under Section 13 (1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, on grounds of cruelty by the wife.

“For a couple to be deprived of each other’s company and of conjugal relationship, is an act of extreme cruelty,” the court said.

The parties in this case were married in 2012 but lived together for only ten months before separating.

Despite efforts from both families to reconcile them, differences between the couple persisted, creating mistrust, unhappiness, and uncertainty in the marriage.

The court noted that even though these differences might seem like normal marital issues individually, their consistent persistence for months, with no resolution in sight, led to mental trauma.

It also highlighted the husband’s constant apprehension about the state of affairs at home, whether he was at work or home. The wife’s act of locking herself in a room reinforced the husband’s fear of false cases being filed against him.

In conclusion, the court deemed the wife’s actions as cruelty and upheld the divorce granted by the family court.

It pointed out the importance of companionship, mutual confidence, and cohesiveness in a marital relationship, which were lacking in this case due to the pervasive fear of false implications.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version