The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. High Court
  3. Liking of “obscene” post on social media is not crime, transmitting such posts is- Allahabad High Court
 Liking of “obscene” post on social media is not crime, transmitting such posts is- Allahabad High Court
High Court Judgements Trending Video

Liking of “obscene” post on social media is not crime, transmitting such posts is- Allahabad High Court

by Newsdesk October 29, 2023

AA

Case Details:

Case Name: Mohd. Imran Kazi v State of UP and another

Case No.: Application U/S 482 No. 31091 of 2023

Bench: Hon’ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.

In a recent hearing the Hon’ble Allahabad Court quashed a case against one accused of transmitting provocative message on social media, which resulted in the assembly of about 600-700 persons belonging to Muslim community for arranging procession without permission, which caused a serious threat to breach of peace which lead to filing of Case No. 17603 of 2020.

The Court after hearing the parties and perusal of records and material on records stated that publishing, transmitting obscene material is an offence. A post or message can be said to be published when it is posted, and a post or message can be said to be transmitted when it is shared or retweeted.

In the present case, it is alleged that there is material in the case diary showing that the applicant has liked the post of one Farhan Usman for unlawful assembly, but liking a post will not amount to publishing or  transmitting the post, therefore, merely liking a post will not attract  Section 67 I.T. Act. Even otherwise, from the material on record, it appears that no message which could be provocative in nature is available on record and merely liking a message published by Chaudhari Farhan Usman will not attract penalty u/s 67 of I.T. Act or any other criminal offence, the Court said.

The Hon’ble Court relied on judgments passed by the Apex Court in Kaushal Kishor v State of U.P. and others (2023) 4 SCC 1 wherein the Apex Court stated that every citizen of India must consciously be restrained in speech and exercise the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

 

Read the judgment or order here: A482(A)_31091_2023

 

Tags: Caution in sharing posts Cyber Crime Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal J. Information Technology Act Liking obscene post Social media
Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version