The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. High Court
  3. Legal profession involves fighting for rights and Advocate tends to react more aggressively even outside Courts – Madras High Court
 Legal profession involves fighting for rights and Advocate tends to react more aggressively even outside Courts – Madras High Court
High Court Judgements Trending Video

Legal profession involves fighting for rights and Advocate tends to react more aggressively even outside Courts – Madras High Court

by Newsdesk September 26, 2023

AA

Case Details:
Case Name: C. Raja v State and another
Case No.: Crl.O.P. No. 19420 of 2023
Bench: Hon’ble N. Anand Venkatesh, J.

In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Bench of Madras High Court came to the rescue of an Advocate who has been arrayed as an accused in a case involving obstruction from performing the official duty.

The case involves a revenue officials who were conducting a survey for removal of encroachment made in Government poramboke land following the procedure under the Land Encroachment Act.

The petitioner who is a practicing Advocate had filed suit on behalf of his client and he accompanied him to the spot and questioned the officials and the same instance was taken to be causing obstruction from performing the official duty and the petitioner has also been arrayed as an accused in the case.

The Court observed that “the demeanor of an Advocate will always be different from the demeanor of a layman. Considering the position that he holds and job that he performs, an Advocate in most of the situations reacts boisterously. This is a character which is developed by an Advocate by virtue of the nature of duty that he performs for his clients. The legal profession involves fighting for the rights of the clients and the Advocate tends to react more aggressively even outside the Courts. It may be true that the petitioner had expressed himself more strongly to defend the rights of his client and that by itself should not result in a criminal prosecution against an Advocate. The main intention on the part of the petitioner was not to prevent the Government officials from performing their function and on the other hand, the petitioner was only attempting to safeguard the rights of his client.”

The Court held that the continuation of the investigation as against the petitioner will result in the abuse of process of Court and liable to be quashed.

Read the order/judgment here: Demeanor of an Advocate will always be different from layman

 

Tags: Case against Advocate Hon'ble N. Anand Venkatesh J. Madras High Court
Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version