The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Kerala HC rules out action against magistrate who inadvertently named rape survivor in order
 Kerala HC rules out action against magistrate who inadvertently named rape survivor in order
From Courts Trending

Kerala HC rules out action against magistrate who inadvertently named rape survivor in order

by Newsdesk January 10, 2024

AA

Kochi, Jan 10 (IANS) The Kerala High Court has upheld the order of a single-judge bench that dismissed a petition seeking legal action against a magistrate who inadvertently revealed the name of a rape survivor in his order.

A division bench of Chief Justice A.J. Desai *and Justice V.G. Arun gave a clean chit to the magistrate while considering an appeal filed by a survivor in a rape case.

The survivor had approached the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kattakkada in the state capital district to cancel the bail granted to the accused A.V. Saiju. However, in his order refusing the plea, the magistrate also revealed the identity of the victim.

The victim then approached the High Court demanding action against the magistrate. However the single bench of Justice Devan Ramachandran, directing immediate anonymisation of records to protect rape survivor’s identity, dismissed the petition seeking action against the magistrate.

The judge ruled that Section 228A of Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalises revealing the identity of victims of certain offences like rape, applies only to those who print or publish the identity of a victim and does not cover situations where a court, during the course of its proceedings, inadvertently reveals such information.

However the judge urged judges and judicial officers to be conscious and wanted steps to anonymise details in cases involving such victims. Following this order, the rape survivor then approached the division bench against the order of the single-judge, but the division bench, after detailed scrutiny, dismissed the appeal.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version