The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Delhi HC urges gender-sensitive lang in legal documents, pleadings
 Delhi HC urges gender-sensitive lang in legal documents, pleadings
Delhi High Court. (File Photo: IANS)
From Courts Trending

Delhi HC urges gender-sensitive lang in legal documents, pleadings

by Newsdesk September 23, 2023

AA

New Delhi, Sep 23 (IANS) While gender-sensitive language should be encouraged, use of derogatory terms that perpetuate gender stereotypes and undermine the dignity and rights of individuals based on their gender should not be used in legal documents and pleadings, the Delhi High Court has said.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made the observation while hearing a woman’s plea challenging a trial court’s grant of anticipatory bail to a man accused of raping her under false pretenses of marriage.

While the court did not cancel the anticipatory bail, it strongly objected to the derogatory language used by the accused against the woman in his counter affidavit.

Justice Sharma cited the recent ‘Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes’ launched by the Supreme Court, suggesting its use in drafting pleadings, orders, and judgements.

The court noted that legal professionals can contribute to dismantling entrenched biases by challenging and discarding gender stereotypes in their language, actions, and interactions.

The court called upon the legal community to promote a culture of gender sensitivity and uphold values of fairness and respect in both professional conduct and legal documents.

While recognising the adversarial nature of the criminal legal system, the court stressed that strong language should not cross the line into offensiveness and should always align with the dignity of the legal profession.

The accused had employed inappropriate language, making derogatory remarks about the woman’s character and marital status.

Justice Sharma condemned the use of such language, stating that it went beyond the permissible boundaries of language expected in legal pleadings.

The court said that using derogatory language that undermines an individual’s dignity based on their gender is incompatible with the principles of equality, dignity, and respect.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version