The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Delhi HC: Seized property must be returned if money-laundering investigation lapses beyond 365 days
 Delhi HC: Seized property must be returned if money-laundering investigation lapses beyond 365 days
Delhi High Court
From Courts Trending

Delhi HC: Seized property must be returned if money-laundering investigation lapses beyond 365 days

by Newsdesk February 2, 2024

AA

New Delhi, Feb 2 (IANS) The Delhi High Court has ruled that if an investigation under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), extends beyond 365 days without resulting in any proceedings related to an offence, the seizure of a property must lapse, and it should be returned to the person from whom it was seized.

Justice Navin Chawla said that the continuation of such seizure beyond the specified period would be confiscatory and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution of India.

Rejecting the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) argument that Section 8(3)(a) of the PMLA does not provide for consequences after 365 days, the court said that the natural consequence is the lapse of the seizure, and the property must be returned.

The case involved Mahender Kumar Khandelwal, appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional of Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL).

The ED, in a money laundering case against BPSL, seized documents, records, digital devices, and jewellry from Khandelwal’s premises in August 2020.

Khandelwal, who was not named in the FIR, sought the return of seized items after more than 365 days without any complaint against him, but the ED refused.

Justice Chawla directed the ED to return the seized documents, digital devices, property, and other materials to Khandelwal, unless a competent court orders otherwise.

The court noted that if the ED wished to conduct a custodial investigation or arrest Khandelwal, it could move an appropriate application before the court, which it had not done.

As the 365-day period had lapsed, the court held that the seized items are liable to be returned.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version