The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Delhi HC rejects restraining order on BharatPe’s Ashneer Grover regarding unpaid shares
 Delhi HC rejects restraining order on BharatPe’s Ashneer Grover regarding unpaid shares
Delhi High Court
From Courts Trending

Delhi HC rejects restraining order on BharatPe’s Ashneer Grover regarding unpaid shares

by Newsdesk December 15, 2023

AA

New Delhi, Dec 15 (IANS) The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to grant a restraining order against BharatPe’s former Managing Director, Ashneer Grover, in connection with a case filed by fintech company’s co-founder Shashvat Nakrani over claims of unpaid shares.

Justice Sachin Datta rejected the interim application filed by Nakrani in his lawsuit against Grover, seeking to prevent him from alienating, transferring, or creating third-party rights in the unpaid shares.

The court clarified that it had declined the interim injunction but directed Grover to provide prior intimation to Nakrani, if and when, he decides to transfer or alienate the shares in question.

Representing Nakrani, senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul had earlier contended that in case filed by co-founder Bhavik Koladiya on the same lines, the court has issued summons and has asked Grover to not create any third-party rights in respect of the shares in BharatPe.

Kaul had said that it is Grover’s stand that he has paid for the shares in cash.

The court had noted that the case was filed about five years after the shares were stated to have been transferred while Kaul argued for an interim relief.

Lawyer Giriraj Subramanium, Grover’s counsel, was questioned by Judge Datta if he was prepared to make a statement that no third-party rights would be created over the shares. To this, Subramanium said that he has instructions not to make such a statement.

“Plaintiff has been heard at some length in the interim relief application. Counsel for the defendant says they don’t want to file a response to the application,” the court said.

Koladiya’s suit seeking to reclaim trasferred shares remains pending before another bench of the High Court.

In the case, when the court had earlier asked Grover to not create any third-party rights over the shares, he had informed the court that subject to further directions from the court, he will not make any third-party interest in the 16,110 shares that Koladiya transferred to him and in any rights that accrue to him as a consequence thereof.

A single-bench judge Justice Prateek Jalan had ordered that Grover will be bound by his statement and directed him to file the undertaking. The bench had noted: “D1 (Grover) is bound to the aforesaid statement and is directed to file an undertaking.”

Nakrani and Koladiya founded the fintech company in 2017. In 2018, Grover joined the company as the third co-founder.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version