The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Delhi HC initiates contempt case against litigant for abuse in virtual proceedings
 Delhi HC initiates contempt case against litigant for abuse in virtual proceedings
Delhi High Court. (File Photo: IANS)
From Courts Trending

Delhi HC initiates contempt case against litigant for abuse in virtual proceedings

by Newsdesk January 19, 2024

AA

New Delhi, Jan 19 (IANS) The Delhi High Court has taken suo motu action in a contempt case against litigant Anita Kumari Gupta for alleged verbal abuse during virtual court proceedings.

Gupta, residing in Sydney, faces contempt charges for making derogatory remarks that lowered the dignity of the court.

Describing Gupta’s comments as “patently contemptuous,” Justice Neena Bansal Krishna issued a show cause notice, directing Gupta to explain why she should not be punished under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The court also asked the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) to impound Gupta’s passport or visa upon her arrival in India, should she return before the next hearing on April 16.

Moreover, Justice Krishna ordered that Gupta not be allowed to leave the country without the court’s permission if she arrives in India.

The High Commission of India in Canberra was directed to communicate the court’s order to Gupta through the Consulate General of India in Sydney.

The contempt case stems from an incident during virtual proceedings on January 10, where Gupta, participating through video conferencing, reportedly abused the court after the adjournment of her case.

After the date was given and another item was taken up, Gupta, who had joined the proceedings through video conferencing, “abused the Court” saying: “What the f…. is going on in this court”.

The court deemed the derogatory remarks as contemptuous, showing a disregard for the court’s dignity despite consent from the parties on the scheduled hearing dates.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version