The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Delhi HC clarifies scope of further investigation in criminal cases
 Delhi HC clarifies scope of further investigation in criminal cases
Delhi High Court. (File Photo: IANS)
From Courts Trending

Delhi HC clarifies scope of further investigation in criminal cases

by Newsdesk February 6, 2024

AA

New Delhi, Feb 6 (IANS) The Delhi High Court has said that the right to further investigation by the police does not entail starting afresh with reinvestigation.

Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta clarified that the purpose of further investigation is not to establish the defence of the accused but to uncover the truth and gather evidence for a fair trial.

The court said that the jurisdictional court retains the discretion to direct further investigation based on the circumstances of each case, even after taking cognizance.

However, it stressed that this discretion should be exercised judiciously before the trial commences.

“While the objective of further investigation remains to find the truth and gather evidence for substantial justice, it does not warrant a mere reinvestigation or fresh investigation from scratch,” the court stated.

These observations were made in response to a plea filed by an accused challenging a trial court’s dismissal of his application for further investigation in a rape case.

The complainant alleged that she was promised marriage by the accused, with whom she entered a sexual relationship via a dating app. Subsequently, she claimed to have become pregnant, after which the accused cut off contact.

The accused sought further investigation into the possibility of the complainant being involved in honey trapping and extortion. However, the court found no evidence to support these claims.

Despite the absence of extortion allegations or substantial evidence linking the complainant to a honey trapping gang, the court concluded that no grounds existed to warrant further investigation as requested by the petitioner.

Consequently, the court set aside the imposed cost on the petitioner and disposed of the petition accordingly.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version