The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Delhi court sets aside magistrate’s ruling, tells him to pass ‘reasoned order’
 Delhi court sets aside magistrate’s ruling, tells him to pass ‘reasoned order’
From Courts

Delhi court sets aside magistrate’s ruling, tells him to pass ‘reasoned order’

by Newsdesk June 9, 2023

AA

New Delhi, June 9 (IANS) A Delhi court on Friday set aside an order of a judicial magistrate and directed him to pass a ‘reasoned’ order, emphasing that every court’s primary objective is to establish the truth and that every investigating agency is also obligated to work towards ascertaining the truth.

Additional Sessions Judge Rakesh Kumar Singh was reviewing a revision petition filed by an advocate challenging the decision of a metropolitan magistrate.

The magisterial court had refused to direct the police to file an FIR based on the advocate’s complaint against his former client.

The advocate had a dispute with his client regarding professional fees, and subsequently, an FIR was lodged against him, accusing him of rape.

The court said that the police have the responsibility of uncovering the truth regarding the entire sequence of events.

After obtaining anticipatory bail, the advocate had approached the police with a counter complaint.

He had sought the registration of an FIR against his former female client, alleging that she had fabricated the story in an attempt to extort money from him.

The advocate claimed that the police took action based on the woman’s FIR and filed a charge sheet against him, which compelled him to approach the magisterial court to file a criminal case against the woman.

The magisterial court had then declined to grant relief to the advocate who had then filed a revision petition in the sessions court, which stated that the complainant’s claim was a cross-case involving the same parties and a series of related transactions.

ASJ Singh said that it is well known that every court should work solely to establish the truth and for this to happen, the basis itself must be truthful, and therefore, every investigating agency is also obligated to work towards ascertaining the truth.

“The order is set aside. The magistrate shall hear the complainant and pass a reasoned order,” ASJ said.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version