The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. From Courts
  3. Brothel customer can be booked under ITP Act for ‘procuring person for prostitution’: Kerala HC
 Brothel customer can be booked under ITP Act for ‘procuring person for prostitution’: Kerala HC
From Courts Trending

Brothel customer can be booked under ITP Act for ‘procuring person for prostitution’: Kerala HC

by Newsdesk December 30, 2023

AA

Kochi, Dec 30 (IANS) The Kerala High Court has held that a customer at a brothel can be hauled up in a case under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (ITP Act).

The court pointed out that while the ITP Act does not define the word “procure”, Section 5 of the Act penalises “procuring, inducing or taking person for the sake of prostitution”.

“The principal object of the statute mentioned in the Statement of Objects and Reasons is to prevent commercialization of the vices and trafficking among women and girls. The meaning of ‘procure’ given in Merriam Webster Dictionary is to get possession of, or to obtain something.

“If the said meaning of the word ‘procure’ is understood in the context of the aforesaid objective of the statute, the person, who gets or obtains domain over a person for the purpose of prostitution, has to be said to procure a person for the purpose of prostitution. In that view of the matter, a consumer also comes within the purview of Section 5 of the ITP Act,” the court judgment read.

The court passed the judgment while hearing a criminal revision petition moved by a man who was found as a customer at a brothel. He was made an accused in a crime registered by the police alleging offences under Sections 3 and 7 (prostitution in or in the vicinity of public places) of the ITP Act.

The petitioner first filed a discharge application before a magistrate court, but it was dismissed and charges were directed to be framed against him.

He the approached the high court, which discharged the petitioner for the offences under Sections 3, 4 and 7, but held that the petitioner is liable to be charged with offence under Section 5.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version