The Apogee
The Apogee
  • Home
  • From Courts
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Law
  • Judgements
    • High Court
    • Supreme Court
  • Achievers
  • Video
  • More
    • Interviews
    • Opinion/Features
    • Research
    • Science
    • Environs
    • Health
  • test-series
  1. Home
  2. Environs
  3. Kerala HC dismisses petition challenging order to shoot man-eating tiger, imposes Rs 25,000 costs
 Kerala HC dismisses petition challenging order to shoot man-eating tiger, imposes Rs 25,000 costs
Environs From Courts Trending

Kerala HC dismisses petition challenging order to shoot man-eating tiger, imposes Rs 25,000 costs

by Newsdesk December 13, 2023

AA

Kochi, Dec 13 (IANS) The Kerala High Court on Wednesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the order issued by top Kerala Forests Department officials directing appropriate steps to be taken to shoot the tiger that had attacked and partially eaten a farmer in the state’s Wayanad.

The court also imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner.

“Considering the order which, in our opinion, is a well-reasoned order, we feel that this public interest litigation has been filed only with motives known to the petitioner. And we dismiss this petition with cost of Rs. 25,000. The amount shall be deposited with the Legal Aid within a period of two weeks from today,” it said.

The Forest order came soon after protests erupted from Wayanad where the partially-eaten body of 36-year-old farmer Prajeesh was found about 500 metres from a forest area on December 9.

Prajeesh had gone to cut grass and when he did not return for long, his brother who went looking for him was aghast seeing his brother’s half-eaten body. The locals soon got around and started a protest as they were demanding immediate action against the tiger which badly mauled Prajeesh.

With locals up in arms and the Forest officials got into the act to catch the tiger and issued an order which held that if the animal cannot be captured or tranquilised, and it is established as a man-eater, then it should be killed, as it has become dangerous to human life in the region.

It was against this order the Animal and Nature Ethics Community (ANEC) moved the court. The court found out that the order was issued after going through various reports and hence dismissed it and imposed costs.

Previous post
Next post

Latest Post

From Courts

Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court quashes false rape and dowry case against would be husband

May 13, 2024
From Courts

SC asks Patanjali to place on record IMA chief’s interview terming apex court observations as ‘unfortunate’

April 30, 2024
From Courts

Delhi HC restrains Ashneer Grover from creating third party rights in BharatPe shares

April 30, 2024
Global

AstraZeneca admits Covishield jab raises TTS risk. Should you be worried?

April 30, 2024
Copyright © 2026 Qoxag. All Right Reserved.
Go to mobile version